🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.